How to reduce javascript object to only contain properties from interface

Posted on

How to reduce javascript object to only contain properties from interface – Even if we have a good project plan and a logical concept, we will spend the majority of our time correcting errors abaout javascript and angularjs. Furthermore, our application can run without obvious errors with JavaScript, we must use various ways to ensure that everything is operating properly. In general, there are two types of errors that you’ll encounter while doing something wrong in code: Syntax Errors and Logic Errors. To make bug fixing easier, every JavaScript error is captured with a full stack trace and the specific line of source code marked. To assist you in resolving the JavaScript error, look at the discuss below to fix problem about How to reduce javascript object to only contain properties from interface.

Problem :

When using typescript a declared interface could look like this:

interface MyInterface {
  test: string;

And an implementation with extra property could be like this:

class MyTest implements MyInterface {
  test: string;
  newTest: string;

Example (here the variable ‘reduced’ still contain the property ‘newTest’):

var test: MyTest = {test: "hello", newTest: "world"}

var reduced: MyInterface = test; // something clever is needed


In a general way, how can you make the ‘reduced’ variable to only contain the properties declared in the ‘MyInterface’ interface.


The problem occur when trying to use the ‘reduced’ variable with angular.toJson before sending it to a rest service – the toJson method transforms the newTest variable, even if it’s not accessible on the instance during compile, and this makes the rest service not accept the json since it has properties that shouldn’t be there.

Solution :

It is not possible to do this. The reason being interface is a Typescript construct and the transpiled JS code is empty

//this code transpiles to empty!
interface MyInterface {
  test: string;

Thus at runtime there is nothing to ‘work with’ – no properties exist to interrogate.

The answer by @jamesmoey explains a workaround to achieve the desired outcome.
A similar solution I use is simply to define the ‘interface’ as a class –

class MyInterface {
  test: string = undefined;

Then you can use lodash to pick the properties from the ‘interface’ to inject into you object:

import _ from 'lodash';  //npm i lodash

const before = { test: "hello", newTest: "world"};
let reduced = new MyInterface();
_.assign(reduced , _.pick(before, _.keys(reduced)));
console.log('reduced', reduced)//contains only 'test' property

see JSFiddle

This is a pragmatic solution that has served me well without getting bogged down on semantics about whether it actually is an interface and/or naming conventions (e.g. IMyInterface or MyInterface) and allows you to mock and unit test

TS 2.1 has Object Spread and Rest, so it is possible now:

var my: MyTest = {test: "hello", newTest: "world"}

var { test, ...reduced } = my;

After that reduced will contain all properties except of “test”.

Another possible approach:

As other answers have mentioned, you can’t avoid doing something at runtime; TypeScript compiles to JavaScript, mostly by simply removing interface/type definitions, annotations, and assertions. The type system is erased, and your MyInterface is nowhere to be found in the runtime code that needs it.

So, you will need something like an array of keys you want to keep in your reduced object:

const myTestKeys = ["test"] as const;

By itself this is fragile, since if MyInterface is modified, your code might not notice. One possible way to make your code notice is to set up some type alias definitions that will cause a compiler error if myTestKeys doesn’t match up with keyof MyInterface:

// the following line will error if myTestKeys has entries not in keyof MyInterface:
type ExtraTestKeysWarning<T extends never =
  Exclude<typeof myTestKeys[number], keyof MyInterface>> = void;
// Type 'UNION_OF_EXTRA_KEY_NAMES_HERE' does not satisfy the constraint 'never'

// the following line will error if myTestKeys is missing entries from keyof MyInterface:
type MissingTestKeysWarning<T extends never =
  Exclude<keyof MyInterface, typeof myTestKeys[number]>> = void;
// Type 'UNION_OF_MISSING_KEY_NAMES_HERE' does not satisfy the constraint 'never'

That’s not very pretty, but if you change MyInterface, one or both of the above lines will give an error that hopefully is expressive enough that the developer can modify myTestKeys.

There are ways to make this more general, or possibly less intrusive, but almost no matter what you do, the best you can reasonably expect from TypeScript is that your code will give compiler warnings in the face of unexpected changes to an interface; not that your code will actually do different things at runtime.

Once you have the keys you care about you can write a pick() function that pulls just those properties out of an object:

function pick<T, K extends keyof T>(obj: T, ...keys: K[]): Pick<T, K> {
  return keys.reduce((o, k) => (o[k] = obj[k], o), {} as Pick<T, K>);

And them we can use it on your test object to get reduced:

var test: MyTest = { test: "hello", newTest: "world" }

const reduced: MyInterface = pick(test, ...myTestKeys);

console.log(JSON.stringify(reduced)); // {"test": "hello"}

That works!

Playground link to code

Are you trying to only set/assign properties listed on the interface only? Functionality like that is not available in TypeScript but it is very simple to write a function to perform the behaviour you looking for.

interface IPerson {
    name: string;

class Person implements IPerson {
	name: string = '';
class Staff implements IPerson {
	name: string = '';
    position: string = '';

var jimStaff: Staff = {
    name: 'Jim',
    position: 'Programmer'

var jim: Person = new Person();
limitedAssign(jimStaff, jim);

function limitedAssign<T,S>(source: T, destination: S): void {
    for (var prop in destination) {
        if (source[prop] && destination.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
            destination[prop] = source[prop];

In your example newTest property won’t be accessible thru the reduced variable, so that’s the goal of using types. The typescript brings type checking, but it doesn’t manipulates the object properties.

In a general way, how can you make the ‘reduced’ variable to only contain the properties declared in the ‘MyInterface’ interface.

Since TypeScript is structural this means that anything that contains the relevant information is Type Compatible and therefore assignable.

That said, TypeScript 1.6 will get a concept called freshness. This will make it easier to catch clear typos (note freshness only applies to object literals):

// ERROR : `newText` does not exist on `MyInterface`
var reduced: MyInterface = {test: "hello", newTest: "world"}; 

Easy example:

let all_animals = { cat: 'bob', dog: 'puka', fish: 'blup' };
const { cat, ...another_animals } = all_animals;
console.log(cat); // bob

One solution could be to use a class instead of an interface and use a factory method (a public static member function that returns a new object of it’s type). The model is the only place where you know the allowed properties and it’s the place where you don’t forget to update them accidentaly on model changes.

class MyClass {
  test: string;

  public static from(myClass: MyClass): MyClass {
    return {test: myClass.test};


class MyTest extends MyClass {
  test: string;
  newTest: string;

const myTest: MyTest = {test: 'foo', newTest: 'bar'};
const myClass: MyClass = MyClass.from(myTest);

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *